efeefe - low tech http://efeefe.no-ip.org/taxonomy/term/57/0 pt-br The Detritus Manifesto http://efeefe.no-ip.org/node/2822 <p> <a href="http://idash.org/pipermail/my-ci/2006-October/000178.html" title="http://idash.org/pipermail/my-ci/2006-October/000178.html" rel="nofollow">http://idash.org/pipermail/my-ci/2006-October/000178.html</a> </p> <p> &quot; </p> <pre> The Detritus Manifesto (The Cheap Asshole Manifesto) It is obvious at this point that one constant of bourgeois society is the production of waste. Some of this waste is unpleasant, unusable or downright dangerous but a large proportion of this waste is in fact a simple matter of fashion. People of means throw out perfectly good stuff every day, not for lack of utility, but because these objects have gone out of style. For artists who lack benefactors, survival is a key question and art and lifestyles are often compromised in the name of economic survival. Our revolutionary goal is to become parasites of the bourgeois. Like fungi and dung beetles, we must learn to live on the detritus of those more affluent than us as their production of waste is guaranteed. The true revolutionary must be cheap cheap cheap! And the cheapest things are in fact free. Always remember that for every $5.15 saved you have one hour to indulge in your art. The revolutionary cheapskate must define himself in constant dialectical opposition to fashion. When “exposed brick” becomes the backdrop to every yuppie porn scene, we will shift to cinder blocks, form-stone or aluminum siding. If your 60's bric-a-brac is the hot item on eBay, it's time to sell. In much the same way, the revolutionary cheapskate must chose her medium in defiance of trends. As the Jones toss their VCR, take up the helm of analog video. Eschew the pricey flat-screen in favor of the free CRT. Breathe new life into nearly defunct cassette tapes. Relish in the aesthetic of the scratchy, the imperfect and the obsolete. Media-culture is even more subject to the whims of popularity. Hence, the cheap asshole must also mine the landfill of junk film, stale print and audio of expired copyright. Unlike the contrived appropriation of the postmodernists, the cheapskate artist steals images out of necessity and proximity. Refuse to upgrade. Does the 10 year old PC not send email, print essays and surf the web? Does the '91 Mazda hatchback not go from point A to point B? New things are shiny and the lights are blue instead of red but new functions are superfluous. Resist the seduction of the new. The rat race is tough but you can't lose if you don't play. Sentimental attachment to material is the greatest threat to our revolution. Any cultural innovation can be co opted by power structures and the only resistance is to give it away willingly and freely. As soon as a material or mode of production becomes hip or expensive, it must be abandoned like a sinking ship. Cheapskate artists of the world unite! Brendan Howell October 30, 2006&quot; Baltimore, USA </pre> <p> &nbsp; </p> bricolabs low tech metareciclagem Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:28:34 +0000 felipefonseca 2822 at http://efeefe.no-ip.org Re: Too much technology http://efeefe.no-ip.org/blog/re-too-much-technology <p> Just sent this email to the people involved with the panel I'd be joining in <a href="http://ietm.org" title="IETM" rel="nofollow">IETM</a> plenary session &quot;Technophobia vs Technophilia&quot;, this week in Montreal. </p> <blockquote> I think that following this kind of perspective I could be seen <br /> as leaning to technophilia, although assuming a critical position.<br /> I'm part of a network here in Brasil - MetaReciclagem - that <br /> proposes a de-constructive approach to technology, meaning<br /> an almost intimate human-machine relationship. But that does <br /> not mean we are seduced by the so techno-fetishism that is <br /> unfortunately so common. We criticize exactly the programmed<br /> obsolescence of technologies - why shouldn't our equipment<br /> last longer if we knew how to do it, hack it, customize it? <br /> Coming from that, the more intimate we get to technology -<br /> free and open source software, freeing hardware and the<br /> such - likely more open are the possibilities.<br /> <br /> I mean, I'm talking here of a kind of sensibility and a kind <br /> of perspective in which technology should not be seen as <br /> something apart from human culture. Technology is culture, <br /> technology is human. It's a matter of understanding technology<br /> in a broader sense - a toothbrush, an axe, the ability to control <br /> fire and language, are all examples of technology, of knowledge<br /> applied in order to make life easier.<br /> <br /> One could spend some time talking about greek drama and the<br /> idea of machina - deus ex machina and all that stuff. In that <br /> sense, technology and the performing arts can always bring<br /> back the idea of ritualizing the use of applied knowledge. A<br /> flying belt or a sensor-arduino-pd-operated PC are all in the<br /> same level, as I see it. </blockquote> bricolabs english low tech metareciclagem Mon, 28 May 2007 21:15:00 +0000 felipefonseca 274 at http://efeefe.no-ip.org